Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  x  No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer  o   Accelerated Filer x  Non-Accelerated Filer  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes  o  No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

-1-

 

Forward-Looking Information

     The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Photronics, Inc. (the "Company"). These statements are based on management's beliefs, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words like "expect", "anticipate", "believe", "plan", "projects", and similar expressions. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. In particular, any statement contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, in press releases, written statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or in the Company's communications and discussions with investors and analysts in the normal course of business through meetings, phone calls and conference calls, regarding the consummation and benefits of future acquisitions, expectations with respect to future sales, financial performance, operating efficiencies and product expansion, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. These factors may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated results, performances or achievements. Factors that might affect such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, overall economic and business conditions; the demand and receipt of orders for the Company's products; competitive factors in the industries and geographic markets in which the Company competes; changes in federal, state and international tax requirements (including tax rate changes, new tax laws and revised tax law interpretations); the Company's ability to place new equipment in service on a timely basis; interest rate fluctuations and other capital market conditions, including foreign currency rate fluctuations; economic and political conditions in international markets; the ability to obtain additional financings; the ability to achieve anticipated synergies and other cost savings in connection with acquisitions and productivity programs; uncertainties with respect to the integration and management of MP Mask Technology Center, LLC (MP Mask); delays in the construction and equipping of the planned nanofab fabrication facilities; the timing, impact and other uncertainties of future acquisitions; the seasonal and cyclical nature of the semiconductor and flat panel display industries; the availability of capital; management changes; damage or destruction to the Company's facilities by natural disasters, labor strikes, political unrest or terrorist activity; the ability to fully utilize its tools; the ability of the Company to receive desired yields, pricing, product mix, and market acceptance of its products; changes in technology; and the ability of the Company to obtain necessary export licenses. Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of these factors. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Company's expectations will be realized. The Company does not assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements and does not assume an obligation to provide revisions to any forward-looking statements.

-2-

 

PHOTRONICS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

 

-3-

 

PART I.     FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.       CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

-4-

 

 

 

-5-

 

 

 

-6-

 

PHOTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Six Months Ended April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share amounts)

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION

     Photronics, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company" or "Photronics") is one of the world's leading manufacturers of photomasks, which are high precision photographic quartz plates containing microscopic images of electronic circuits. Photomasks are a key element in the manufacture of semiconductors and flat panel displays (FPD), and are used as masters to transfer circuit patterns onto semiconductor wafers and flat panel substrates during the fabrication of integrated circuits (IC) and a variety of FPD and, to a lesser extent, other types of electrical and optical components. The Company currently operates principally from ten manufacturing facilities, two of which are located in the United States, three in Europe, two in Taiwan, and one each in Korea, Singapore and China, which began production in the second quarter of the Company's fiscal 2007 year. The Company is also constructing an independent state-of-the-art nanofab facility (the "New NanoFab") in Boise, Idaho, under a build-to-suit lease agreement with Micron Technology, Inc. which is expected to be completed by the end of calendar year 2007.

     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending October 28, 2007. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 29, 2006.

NOTE 2 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

     The following table summarizes comprehensive income for the three and six months ended April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006:

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006		April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006
Net income		$14,066		$5,265		$21,923		$14,958
Other comprehensive income:
Change in unrealized net       gains on investments,       net of tax		(133)		(1,358)		(120)		(1,284)
Change in fair value of cash      flow hedges		110		28		(1,373)		56
Foreign currency translation       adjustments		467		4,649		6,558		20,674
		444		3,319		5,065		19,446
Total comprehensive income		$14,510		$8,584		$26,988		$34,404

 

-7-

 

NOTE 3 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

     The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share is presented below:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006		April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006
Net income	$14,066		$5,265		$21,923		$14,958
Effect of dilutive securities:
Interest expense on convertible notes,     net of related tax effect	1,100		1,100		2,201		2,201
Earnings for diluted earnings per share	$15,166		$6,365		$24,124		$17,159
Weighted average common shares computations:
Weighted average common shares used for      basic earnings per share	41,513		41,334		41,494		41,325
Effect of dilutive securities:
Convertible notes	9,441		9,441		9,441		9,441
Employee stock options	445		212		445		200
Dilutive potential common shares	9,886		9,653		9,886		9,641
Weighted average common shares used for    diluted earnings per share	51,399		50,987		51,380		50,966
Basic earnings per share	$0.34		$0.13		$0.53		$0.36
Diluted earnings per share	$0.30		$0.12		$0.47		$0.34

 

     The effect of the potential conversion of some of the Company's convertible subordinated notes and the exercise of certain stock options has been antidilutive. The following table shows the amount of incremental shares outstanding that would have been added if the assumed conversion of convertible subordinated notes and stock options had been dilutive.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006		April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006
Convertible notes	-		2,354		608		2,354
Employee stock options	1,770		911		1,789		1,012
Total potentially dilutive shares excluded	1,770		3,265		2,397		3,366

 

NOTE 4 - INVESTMENTS

     Short-term investments at April 29, 2007 and October 29, 2006 consist of available-for-sale fixed income and marketable equity securities. Long-term investments of $408 at April 29, 2007 and $706 at October 29, 2006 included in "Other Assets" primarily consist of available-for-sale equity securities, where fair values were determined based upon quoted market prices. For investments with no quoted market price, the estimated fair value is based upon the financial condition and the operating results and projections of the investee and is considered to approximate cost.

-8-

 

      Available-for-sale investments at April 29, 2007 were as follows:

		Cost Basis		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Short-term debt investments:
Auction rate securities		$12,000		$    -		$      -		$12,000
Foreign bond funds and other		9,757		177		-		9,934
Total short-term investments		21,757		177		-		21,934
Long-term equity investments		30		378		-		408
		$21,787		$555		$      -		$22,342
Available-for-sale investments at October 29, 2006 were as follows:
		Cost Basis		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair   Value
Short-term debt investments:
Auction rate securities		$50,400		$    -		$      -		$50,400
Foreign bond funds and other		19,479		125		(105)		19,499
Total short-term investments		69,879		125		(105)		69,899
Long-term equity investments		51		655		-		706
		$69,930		$780		$(105)		$70,605

 

     In determining whether investment holdings are other than temporarily impaired, the Company considers the nature, cause, severity and duration of the impairment. The Company and its investment advisors used analyst reports, credit ratings or other items as part of its review. No investments were considered to be other than temporarily impaired as of April 29, 2007.

     The maturities of available-for-sale short-term debt investments at April 29, 2007 were as follows:

		Cost Basis		Estimated Fair Value
Due in one year or less		$ 9,757		$ 9,934
Due after ten years		12,000		12,000
		$21,757		$21,934

 

     In the six month periods ended April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006, the Company sold $47.4 million and $47.2 million, respectively, of short-term debt investments.

-9-

 

     Gross realized gains and losses related to the Company's investments are as follows:

		Six Months Ended
		April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006
Gross realized gains		$435		$2,165
Gross realized losses		(87)		(41)
Net realized gains		$348		$2,124

 

NOTE 5 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

     In March 2007 shareholders approved a new stock-based compensation plan (the "Plan"), under which options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance stock, performance units, and other awards based on, or related to shares of the Company's common stock may be granted from shares authorized but unissued, shares previously issued and reacquired by the Company or both.  A maximum of three million shares of Common Stock may be issued under the Plan.  Awards may be granted to Company officers, employees and directors, non-employee directors, consultants, advisors and independent contractors of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company. The Plan prohibits further awards from being issued under prior plans.  The Plans are more fully described below. The Company incurred compensation expense under those Plans for the three and six months ended April 29, 2007 of $0.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively, as compared to $0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the comparable prior year periods.  No compensation cost was capitalized as part of inventory, and no income tax benefit was recorded in those years. No equity awards were settled in cash during the periods presented.

Stock Options

     Option awards generally vest in one to four years, and have a ten year contractual term. All incentive and non-qualified stock option grants must have an exercise price no less than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The option and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control as defined in the Plan.

     The fair value of option grants is determined with the closing price on the day of grant using the Black Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company's stock. The Company uses historical option exercise behavior and employee termination data to estimate option life, which represents the period of time that the options granted are expected to remain outstanding. The risk-free rate of return for the estimated life of the option is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The weighted average assumptions used for the six months ended April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006 are noted in the following table.

		Six Months Ended
		April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006
Volatility		52.8%		58.0%
Risk-free rate of return		4.5%		4.4%
Dividend yield		0.0%		0.0%
Weighted average life		4.6 years		4.9 years

 

-10-

 

     A summary of option activity under the Plan as of April 29, 2007 is presented below:

Options		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at April 29, 2007		2,444,845		$18.72		6.8 years		$825
Exercisable at April 29, 2007		1,671,207		$19.58		5.8 years		$754

 

     During the six months ending April 29, 2007, 50,750 shares were granted with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $7.31 per share. For the comparable period last year 10,750 shares were granted with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $8.01 per share. As of April 29, 2007 the total compensation cost for non-vested awards not yet recognized was approximately $4.7 million. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average amortization period of 3.1 years.

Restricted Stock

     The Company also grants restricted stock awards annually. The restrictions on these awards lapse over a service period that has ranged from less than one to eight years. During the six months ending April 29, 2007, 36,500 shares were granted with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $14.11 per share. For the comparable period last year 60,000 shares were granted with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $15.11 per share. As of April 29, 2007 the total compensation cost for non-vested awards not yet recognized was approximately $3.7 million.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average amortization period of 6.1 years. A summary of the status of the Company's nonvested restricted shares as of April 29, 2007 is presented below:

Restricted Stock		Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at April 29, 2007		282,875		7.5 years		$4,351

 

NOTE 6 - LEASE LIABILITIES RELATED TO RESTRUCTURING

     Since 2001, the Company has closed manufacturing facilities in North America and in Europe due in part to the migration of semiconductor manufacturing to Asia, excess capacity, competitive pricing pressures and weakened demand. Decisions regarding which facilities to close were based on sales volume projections, customer base and production qualifications. The Company continues to assess its global manufacturing strategy based on changes in market conditions. This ongoing assessment could result, in the future, in facilities closures, asset redeployment, workforce reductions, or the addition of increased manufacturing facilities, all of which would be predicated by market conditions and customer requirements.

     In fiscal 2006, the Company recorded total restructuring charges of $15.6 million primarily related to ceasing operations at its manufacturing and research and development facility in Austin, Texas. During the first quarter of 2007, the Company sold this facility for proceeds of $5.0 million and realized a gain of $2.3 million.

     The following tables set forth the Company's restructuring reserves as of April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006 respectively, and reflect the activity affecting the reserves for the three and six months then ended. As of April 29, 2007, the remaining liability of $2.0 million primarily represents non-cancelable lease obligations that are due under respective lease terms through 2009.

-11-

 

		Three Months Ended
		April 29, 2007
		January 28, 2007		Charges		Utilized		April 29, 2007
Leases and other		$2,314		$  -		$(295)		$2,019
		Six Months Ended
		April 29, 2007
		October 29, 2006		Charges		Utilized		April 29, 2007
Leases and other		$2,654		$  -		$(635)		$2,019

 

     The following tables set forth the Company's restructuring reserve as of April 30, 2006 and reflects the activity affecting the reserve for the three and six months then ended (in thousands):

		Three Months Ended
		April 30, 2006
		January 29, 2006		Charges		Utilized			April 30, 2006
Manufacturing capacity reduction   and other		$       -		$ 9,016		$(8,714)			$   302
Workforce reductions		-		1,256		(176)			1,080
Leases and other		1,911		1,154		(434)			2,631
Total		$1,911		$11,426		$(9,324)			$4,013
		Six Months Ended
		April 30, 2006
		October 30, 2005		Charges		Utilized			April 30, 2006
Manufacturing capacity reduction   and other		$       -		$ 9,016		$(8,714)			$   302
Workforce reductions		-		1,256		(176)			1,080
Leases and other		2,245		1,154		(768)			2,631
Total		$2,245		$11,426		$(9,658)			$4,013

 

-12-

 

NOTE 7 - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

     The Company operates in a single industry segment as a manufacturer of photomasks, which are high precision quartz plates containing microscopic images of electronic circuits for use in the fabrication of semiconductors. The Company's net sales, operating income (loss) and identifiable assets by geographic area as of and for the three and six months ended April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006		April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006
Net sales
Asia	$ 63,896		$ 65,403		$122,605		$126,561
Europe	18,999		19,829		38,488		39,812
North America	26,731		34,239		54,514		65,046
	$109,626		$119,471		$215,607		$231,419
Operating Income
Asia	$3,851		$14,427		$ 9,325		$27,847
Europe	1,943		4,397		4,542		9,118
North America	2,331		(366)		3,550		(5,338)
Gain on sale of facility	-		-		2,254		-
Consolidation, restructuring
and related charges	-		(11,426)		-		(11,426)
Stock-based compensation	(698)		(369)		(1,486)		(793)
	$7,427		$ 6,663		$18,185		$19,408
			April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006
Total identifiable assets
Asia			$478,199		$440,460
Europe			118,674		109,763
North America			380,446		445,060
			$977,319		$995,283

 

     The Company is typically impacted during its first fiscal quarter by the North America and European holiday periods as some customers reduce their effective workdays and orders during this period. The Company's first quarter of fiscal 2007 had more than the usual customer shutdowns which resulted in reduced net sales.

NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES

     The income tax provision differs from the amount computed by applying the United States statutory rate of 35 percent to income before income taxes primarily due to the resolution and settlement of U.S. and foreign tax matters that were associated with uncertain tax positions in prior years, which benefited the income tax provision for the three and six month periods ended April 29, 2007 in the amount of $7.4 million. In addition, the Company has benefited from reduced tax rates in Korea and Taiwan, which have been offset by valuation allowances placed on deferred tax assets in the U.S., primarily those generated by net operating loss carry forwards.

-13-

 

NOTE 9 - LONG -TERM BORROWINGS

     Long-term borrowings consist of the following:

		April 29, 2007		October 29, 2006
4.75% convertible subordinated notes,   including fair value adjustment of   $(184) in 2006		$          -		$ 86,903
2.25% convertible subordinated   notes due April 15, 2008		150,000		150,000
Unsecured notes payable		24,106		20,288
		174,106		257,191
Less current portion		25,000		86,903
		$149,106		$170,288

 

     On June 6, 2007, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a group of financial institutions that provides for a five-year, revolving credit facility (the "credit facility") with an aggregate commitment of $125 million. In connection therewith, the Company has classified $125 million of its $150 million, 2.25% convertible subordinated notes due in April 2008 as long-term. The applicable interest rate spread and facility fee vary based upon the Company's senior leverage ratio.  Under the terms of the credit facility, the Company is subject to compliance with certain financial and non-financial covenants. The credit facility is secured by a pledge of the Company's stock in certain of its subsidiaries. There were no borrowings under the credit facility as of June 7, 2007.

      The 4.75% convertible subordinated notes were repaid at maturity on December 15, 2006. A related interest rate swap also matured on December 15, 2006 concurrent with the repayment of the related debt.

NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

     At April 29, 2007, the Company had commitments outstanding of approximately $210 million, for capital expenditures primarily related to equipment for the planned U.S. nanofab facility and equipment in Korea, and for a build-to-suit capital lease through 2012 for the planned U.S. nanofab facility.

     The Company is subject to various claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes such claims, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the business of the Company.

NOTE 11 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

     In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115." SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value, and is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

     In October 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, "Employer's Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)." SFAS No. 158 requires companies to recognize in its statement of financial condition the funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation. SFAS No. 158 also requires an entity to recognize changes in the funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plan directly to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, to the extent such changes are not recognized in earnings as components of periodic net benefit cost. SFAS No. 158 is effective for companies with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating SFAS No. 158, however it does not believe the impact of its adoption will be material to its consolidated financial statements.

-14-

 

     In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements." SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS No. 157 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

     In September 2006, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, "Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements" (SAB No. 108). This SAB provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB No. 108 establishes an approach that requires quantification of financial statement errors based on the effects of each of the company's balance sheets and statements of operations financial statements and the related financial statement disclosures. The SAB permits existing public companies to record the cumulative effect of initially applying this approach in the first year ending after November 15, 2006 by recording the necessary correcting adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of that year with the offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings. Additionally, the use of the cumulative effect transition method requires detailed disclosure of the nature and amount of each individual error being corrected through the cumulative adjustment and how and when it arose. The Company early adopted SAB No. 108 during its quarter ended January 28, 2007, and its adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

     In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation Number 48 (FIN 48), "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109." The interpretation contains a two step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The provisions are effective as of the beginning of the Company's 2008 fiscal year. The Company is evaluating the impact, if any, this statement may have on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
                OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

Overview

     Management's discussion and analysis of the Company's financial condition, business results and outlook should be read in conjunction with its condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes. Various segments of this MD&A do contain forward-looking statements, all of which are presented based on current expectations and may be adversely affected by uncertainties and risk factors presented throughout this filing and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal 2006 year, leading actual results to materially differ from these expectations.

     The Company sells substantially all of its photomasks to semiconductor designers and manufacturers, and manufacturers of flat panel displays (FPDs). Photomask technology is also being applied to the fabrication of other higher performance electronic products such as photonics, micro-electronic mechanical systems and certain nanotechnology applications. The Company's selling cycle is tightly interwoven with the development and release of new semiconductor designs and flat panel applications, particularly as it relates to the semiconductor industry's migration to more advanced design methodologies and fabrication processes. The Company believes that the demand for photomasks primarily depends on design activity rather than sales volumes from products produced using photomask technologies. Consequently, an increase in semiconductor or FPD sales does not necessarily result in a corresponding increase in photomask sales. In addition, the reduced use of customized integrated circuits (ICs), a reduction in design complexity or other changes in the technology or methods of manufacturing semiconductors or a slowdown in the introduction of new semiconductor or FPD designs could reduce demand for photomasks even if demand for semiconductors and FPDs increases. Advances in semiconductor and photomask design and semiconductor production methods could reduce the demand for photomasks. Historically, the semiconductor industry has been volatile, with sharp periodic downturns and slowdowns. These downturns have been characterized by, among other things, diminished product demand, excess production capacity and accelerated erosion of selling prices.

-15-

 

Material Changes in Results of Operations
Three and Six Months ended April 29, 2007 versus April 30, 2006

     The following table represents selected operating information expressed as a percentage of net sales:

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006		April 29, 2007		April 30, 2006
Net sales		100.0%		100.0%		100.0%		100.0%
Cost of sales		(76.1)		(65.0)		(74.1)		(66.3)
Gross margin		23.9		35.0		25.9		33.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(13.2)		(13.2)		(14.3)		(13.4)
Research and development expenses		(3.9)		(6.7)		(4.2)		(7.0)
Consolidation, restructuring and related charges		-		(9.5)		-		(4.9)
Gain on sale of facility		-		-		1.0		-
Operating income		6.8		5.6		8.4		8.4
Other income (expense), net		0.4		3.2		0.1		2.4
Income before income taxes and minority interest		7.2		8.8		8.5		10.8
Income tax benefit (provision)		5.8		(3.2)		2.4		(3.3)
Minority interest		(0.2)		(1.2)		(0.7)		(1.0)
Net income		12.8%		4.4%		10.2%		6.5%

 

     All of the following tabular comparisons, unless otherwise indicated, are for the three months ended April 29, 2007 (Q2-07) and April 30, 2006 (Q2-06) and for the six months ended April 29, 2007 (YTD-07) and April 30, 2006 (YTD-06) in millions of dollars:

Net Sales

		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		Q2-07		Q2-06		Percent Change		YTD-07		YTD-06		Percent Change
IC		$ 88.3		$ 91.0		(3.0)%		$173.9		$177.4		(2.0)%
FPD		21.3		28.5		(25.0)		41.7		54.0		(22.7)
Total net sales		$109.6		$119.5		(8.2)%		$215.6		$231.4		(6.8)%

 

-16-

 

     Net sales for Q2-07 decreased 8.2% to $109.6 million as compared to $119.5 million for Q2-06. The decrease is principally related to reduced sales of FPD photomasks of $7.2 million primarily associated with decreased average selling prices (ASPs) for high-end FPD photomasks. Sales of IC photomasks declined approximately $2.7 million as a result of a slight decline in ASPs, principally from mainstream products. High-end photomask applications, which typically have higher ASPs, include mask sets for FPD products using G6 and above technologies and IC products using 90 nanometer and below technologies. By geographic area, net sales in Q2-07 as compared to Q2-06 decreased by $1.5 million or 2.3% in Asia, $7.5 million or 21.9% in North America, and $0.8 million or 4.2% in Europe. As a percent of total sales in Q2-07, sales were 58% in Asia, 24% in North America, and 18% in Europe.

     For YTD-07, net sales decreased 6.8% or $15.8 million of which $12.3 million of the decrease related to reduced sales of FPD photomasks as a result of decreased average selling prices for FPD products. The Company's quarterly revenues can be affected by the seasonal purchasing of its customers. The Company is typically impacted during its first quarter by the North American and European holiday periods as some customers reduce their effective workdays and orders during this period. Q1-07 had more than the usual customer shutdowns which resulted in reduced net sales.

Gross Margin

		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		Q2-07		Q2-06		Percent Change		YTD-07		YTD-06		Percent Change
Gross margin		$26.2		$41.8		(37.3)%		$55.9		$78.0		(28.4)%
Percentage of net sales		23.9%		35.0%				25.9%		33.7%

 

     Gross margin decreased to 23.9% in Q2-07 from 35.0% in Q2-06 as a result of decreased sales and the expanded manufacturing base in Asia including two greenfield facilities in Taiwan and China. Gross margin decreased to 25.9% in YTD-07 from 33.7% in YTD-06 primarily due to decreased FPD ASPs and the Company's increased manufacturing base in Asia. The Company operates in a high fixed cost environment and to the extent that the Company's revenues and utilization increase or decrease, gross margin will generally be positively or negatively impacted.  The gross margin percentage throughout the remainder of fiscal 2007 could be negatively impacted by increased depreciation expense associated with the Company's capital expenditures as the Company increases its fixed cost manufacturing base, principally in Asia.

Selling, General and Administrative

		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		Q2-07		Q2-06		Percent Change		YTD-07		YTD-06		Percent Change
Selling, general and   administrative expenses		$14.4		$15.7		(8.2)%		$30.9		$30.9		-
Percentage of net sales		13.2%		13.2%				14.3%		13.4%

 

      Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.3 million to $14.4 million in Q2-07, compared with $15.7 million in Q2-06.  The reduction was primarily a result of the Company's two new facilities in Taiwan and China being operational in Q2-07 and therefore certain costs related thereto are reported as cost of sales whereas prior to them becoming operational for production such costs were reported as selling, general and administrative expenses, and decreased compensation costs. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $30.9 million in YTD-07 and YTD-06.

-17-

 

Research and Development

		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		Q2-07		Q2-06		Percent Change		YTD-07		YTD-06		Percent Change
Research and development		$4.3		$8.0		(45.9)%		$9.0		$16.2		(44.3)%
Percentage of net sales		3.9%		6.7%				4.2%		7.0%

 

     Research and development expenses consist primarily of global development efforts relating to high-end process technologies for advanced sub wavelength reticle solutions for IC and FPD technologies. Research and development expenses decreased by $3.7 million and $7.2 million in Q2-07 and YTD-07, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily as a result of reduced expenditures resulting from the 2006 closure of the Company's Austin, Texas research and development operations. Such reduced expenditures were partially offset by amortization expenses of the fair value of the agreement to license technology from Micron Technology, Inc.

Gain on Sale of Facility

     In January of 2007, the Company sold its Austin, Texas manufacturing and research and development facility for proceeds of $5.0 million and realized a gain of $2.3 million.

Consolidation, Restructuring and Related Charges

     In March 2006, the Company implemented a restructuring program to streamline its operating infrastructure in North America, including the closing of its Austin, Texas manufacturing facility and ceasing its Austin, Texas research and development activities.  The Company recorded a total restructure charge of $11.4 million in the second quarter of 2006, primarily comprised of facility and equipment impairments at the Austin facility.

Other Income (Expense), Net

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		Q2-07		Q2-06		YTD-07		YTD-06
Interest expense		$(0.9)		$(3.2)		$(3.0)		$(6.0)
Investment and other income, net		1.3		7.0		3.1		11.6
Other income (expense), net		$ 0.4		$ 3.8		$ 0.1		$ 5.6

 

     Interest expense in Q2-07 and YTD-07 decreased as compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily as a result of the Company's redeeming the remaining outstanding balance of its $87.1 million, 4.75% convertible subordinated notes in December, 2006.  Investment and other income, net, for Q2-07 and YTD-07 decreased as compared to the same periods in the prior year as a result of decreased investment income associated with reduced investment balances, and decreased foreign currency gains. Further, realized gains on the sales of investments were $0.3 million YTD-07 as compared to $2.1 million in YTD-06.

Provision for Income Taxes

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		Q2-07		Q2-06		YTD-07		YTD-06
Income tax benefit (provision)		$6.4		$(3.8)		$5.1		$(7.6)
Effective income tax rate		81.5%		(36.5)%		27.8%		(30.6)%

 

-18-

 

     The effective income tax benefit rate of 81.5% in Q2-07 resulted from the benefit recorded for the resolution and settlement of U.S. and foreign tax matters that were associated with uncertain tax positions in prior years. In addition, the tax rate was impacted by taxes incurred on income generated in taxable rates that were partially offset by increased income generated in the U.S. where the Company did not record additional deferred tax benefits due to net operating loss carryforwards. The income tax benefit for the three and six month periods ended April 29, 2007 primarily resulted from benefits associated with the tax settlements.

     The Company's operations have followed the migration of semiconductor industry fabrication to Asia, where the Company operates in countries where it is accorded favorable tax rates. The Company is accorded tax holidays in Taiwan, one of which expired in December 2006, and another which is expected to begin to expire in 2012. In addition, the Company has been accorded a tax holiday in China which is expected to expire in 2011. In Korea, various investment tax credits have been utilized to reduce the Company's effective income tax rate.

Minority Interest in Consolidated Subsidiaries

     Minority interest expense decreased $1.2 million to $0.2 million for Q2-07 and by $0.9 million in YTD-07 as compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to decreased net income of the Company's non-wholly owned subsidiary in Taiwan. The Company's ownership in its subsidiaries in Taiwan and Korea was approximately 58% and 99.7%, respectively, at April 29, 2007 and October 29, 2006.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     The Company's working capital increased $15.6 million to $143.2 million at April 29, 2007 as compared to October 29, 2006, primarily as a result of increased cash generated from operations, and a decrease in the current portion of long-term borrowings.  At April 29, 2007, $125 million of the Company's outstanding $150 million, 2.25% convertible subordinated notes due in April of 2008, was reported as long-term in connection with $125 million of credit available to the Company under a five-year, revolving credit facility agreement entered into on June 6, 2007 with a group of financial institutions.Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased to $153.7 million at April 29, 2007 as compared to $199.3 million at October 29, 2006, primarily due to the redemption of $87.1 million of the remaining outstanding balance of the Company's 4.75% convertible subordinated notes. Cash provided by operating activities increased to $71.5 million for the six months ended April 29, 2007, primarily due to increased net income compared to the same prior year period, and decreased accounts receivable associated with decreased sales compared to the same period in the prior year, and increased trade accounts payable, which were in part offset by decreases in accrued liabilities. Cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended April 29, 2007 was $16.2 million, which is primarily comprised of $48.5 million proceeds from the sales of investments less payments for capital expenditures of $37.3 million.  Cash used in financing activities was $83.2 million which primarily related to the Company redeeming its $87.1 million outstanding 4.75% convertible subordinated notes.

     The Company's commitments represent investments in the tooling of the new US Nano Fab facility in Boise, Idaho, additional manufacturing capacity, as well as advanced equipment for the production of high-end, more complex photomasks in Asia, principally Korea. At April 29, 2007, Photronics had commitments outstanding of approximately $210 million, primarily related to equipment for the planned U.S. nanofab facility and equipment in Korea, and for a build-to-suit capital lease through 2012 for the planned U.S. nanofab facility. The Company expects capital expenditures for fiscal 2007 to be approximately $135 million to $165 million. The Company will continue to use its working capital to finance its capital expenditures. Photronics believes that its currently available resources, together with its capacity for growth, and its access to other debt and equity financing sources, are sufficient to satisfy its currently planned capital expenditures, as well as its anticipated working capital requirements for the foreseeable future.

     In May 2007, the Company paid Micron Technology, Inc. (Micron) $7.5 million in connection with its $135 million investment in May 2006 for a 49.99% interest in MP Mask Technology Center, LLC and a license for photomask technology of Micron and certain supply agreements.

-19-

 

Stock-Based Compensation

     Total stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended April 29, 2007 was $0.7 million and $1.5 million respectively, as compared to $0.4 million and $0.8 million respectively for the comparable prior year periods, substantially all of which is in selling, general and administrative expenses. No compensation cost was capitalized as part of inventory, and no income tax benefit has been recorded. As of April 29, 2007 total unrecognized compensation cost of $8.4 million is expected to be recognized over a weighted average amortization period of 4.4 years.

Business Outlook

     A majority of the Company's revenue growth has come from, and is expected to continue to come from, the Asian region as customers increase their use of manufacturing foundries located outside of North America and Europe. Additional revenue growth is also anticipated from North America and Europe as a result of utilizing technology licensed under the Company's technology license with Micron Technology, Inc. The Company's Korean and Taiwanese operations are non-wholly owned subsidiaries; therefore a portion of earnings generated at each location is allocated to the minority shareholders.

     The Company continues to assess its global manufacturing strategy based on changes in market conditions. In addition to the restructuring plan implemented in the second quarter of 2006 relating to closing the Austin facility, this ongoing assessment could result in the future, in facilities closures, asset redeployment, workforce reductions, or the addition of increased manufacturing facilities, all of which would be based on market conditions and customer requirements.

     The Company's future results of operations and the other forward-looking statements contained in this filing involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Various factors that have been discussed and a number of other factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations.

Application of Critical Accounting Procedures

     The Company's consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. The Company believes that the following are some of the more critical judgment areas in the application of the Company's accounting policies that affect its financial condition and results of operations.

Estimates and Assumptions

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in them. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company's estimates are based on the facts and circumstances available at the time; different reasonable estimates could have been used in the current period, and changes in the accounting estimates used are likely to occur from period to period, which may have a material impact on the presentation of the Company's financial condition and results of operations. Actual results reported by the Company may differ from such estimates. The Company reviews these estimates periodically and reflects the effect of revisions in the period that they are determined.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

     The Company records derivatives in the consolidated balance sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivatives are reported in the consolidated statements of income or as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders' equity, depending on the use of the derivatives and whether they qualify for hedge accounting. In order to qualify for hedge accounting, the derivative must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged items during the term of the hedge. The Company uses judgment in assessing the fair value of derivatives and related financial instruments, including assumptions utilized in derivative fair value models in areas such as projected interest rates and changes in the Company's stock price during the contract term.

-20-

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

     Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Repairs and maintenance, as well as renewals and replacements of a routine nature are charged to operations as incurred, while those which improve or extend the lives of existing assets are capitalized. Upon sale or other disposition, the cost of the asset and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.

     Depreciation and amortization are computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over 15 to 40 years, machinery and equipment over 3 to 10 years and furniture, fixtures and office equipment over 3 to 5 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvement, whichever is less. Judgment and assumptions are used in establishing estimated useful lives and depreciation periods. The Company also uses judgment and assumptions as it periodically reviews property, plant and equipment for any potential impairment in carrying values whenever events such as a significant industry downturn, plant closures, technological obsolescence or other changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Actual fair values may differ from estimated fair values.

Intangible Assets

     Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangibles, and a technology license agreement and a supply agreement. These assets are stated at fair value as of the date acquired less accumulated amortization. Amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis or another method that more fairly represents the utilization of the assets. The future economic benefit of the carrying value of intangible assets is reviewed annually and the Company uses judgment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an intangible asset may not be recoverable based on discounted cash flows or market factors and an impairment loss would be recorded in the period so determined.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

     Long-lived assets and certain identifiable assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the Company's judgment and estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset. Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Investment in Joint Venture

     Investments in joint ventures over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence and that, in general, are at least 20 percent owned are stated at cost plus equity in undistributed net income (loss) of the joint venture. These investments are evaluated for impairment in accordance with the requirements of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 18, "The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock." An impairment loss would be recorded whenever a decline in value of an equity investment below its carrying amount is determined to be other than temporary. In judging "other than temporary," the Company would consider the length of time and extent to which the fair value of the investment has been less than the carrying amount of the equity company, the near-term and longer-term operating and financial prospects of the equity company, and its longer-term intent of retaining the investment in the equity company.

-21-

 

Income Taxes

     The income tax provision is computed on the basis of consolidated financial statement income or loss before income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. In the event the Company determines that future taxable income is not expected to be sufficient, the Company uses judgment and assumptions to determine if valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets are required by considering future market growth, forecasted operations, future taxable income, and the mix of earnings in the tax jurisdictions in which it operates in order to determine the need for a valuation allowance.

     The Company considers income taxes in each of the tax jurisdictions in which it operates in order to determine its effective income tax rate. Current income tax exposure is identified along with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and financial reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The actual annual amount of taxable income in each tax jurisdiction may differ from the estimates used to compute the effective income tax rate during the first, second and third quarters. Additionally, the Company evaluates the recoverability of deferred income tax assets from future taxable income and establishes valuation allowances if recovery is deemed not likely. Accordingly, the income tax provision in the consolidated statements of income is impacted by changes in the valuation allowance. Significant management estimates and judgment are required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets.

Revenue Recognition

     The Company recognizes revenue when both title and risk of loss transfer to the customer. The Company makes estimates and assumptions and uses judgment relating to discounts and estimates for product return and warranties which are accrued and recognized at the time of sale.

     Discounts - Sales discounts are negotiated with customers prior to billing and at the time of billing, sales invoices are prepared net of negotiated sales discounts.

     Product Returns - Customer returns have historically been insignificant. However, the Company does record a liability for the insignificant amount of estimated sales returns based upon historical experience.

     Warranties and Other Post Shipment Obligations - For a 30-day period, the Company warrants that items sold will conform to customer specification. However, the Company's liability is limited to repair or replacement of the photomasks at its sole option. The Company inspects photomasks for conformity to customer specifications prior to shipment. Accordingly, customer returns of items under warranty have historically been insignificant. However, the Company records a liability for the insignificant amount of estimated warranty returns based on historical experience. The Company's specific return policies include accepting returns for products with defects or products that have not been produced to precise customer specifications. At the time of shipment, a liability is established for these items.

     Customer Acceptance - Customer acceptance occurs concurrently with the transfer of title and risk of loss based upon the applicable shipping and delivery terms.

Effect of New Accounting Standards

     In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115." SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value, and is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

     In October 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, "Employer's Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)." SFAS No. 158 requires companies to recognize in its statement of financial condition the funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plans,

-22-

 

measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation. SFAS No. 158 also requires an entity to recognize changes in the funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plan directly to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, to the extent such changes are not recognized in earnings as components of periodic net benefit cost. SFAS No. 158 is effective for companies with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating SFAS No. 158, however it does not believe the impact of its adoption will be material to its consolidated financial statements.

     In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements." SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS No. 157 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

     In September 2006, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, "Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements" (SAB No. 108). This SAB provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB No. 108 establishes an approach that requires quantification of financial statement errors based on the effects of each of the company's balance sheets and statements of operations financial statements and the related financial statement disclosures. The SAB permits existing public companies to record the cumulative effect of initially applying this approach in the first year ending after November 15, 2006 by recording the necessary correcting adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of that year with the offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings. Additionally, the use of the cumulative effect transition method requires detailed disclosure of the nature and amount of each individual error being corrected through the cumulative adjustment and how and when it arose. The Company early adopted SAB No. 108 during its quarter ended January 28, 2007, and its adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

     In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation Number 48 (FIN 48), "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109." The interpretation contains a two step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The provisions are effective as of the beginning of the Company's 2008 fiscal year. The Company is evaluating the impact, if any, this statement may have on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     The Company records derivatives on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value. The Company does not engage in derivative instruments for speculative purposes. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivatives are reported in the statement of income, or as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders' equity, depending on the use of the derivatives and whether they qualify for hedge accounting. In order to qualify for hedge accounting, the derivative must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged items during the term of the hedge. In general, the types of risks hedged are those relating to the variability of future cash flows caused by movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company documents its risk management strategy and hedge effectiveness at the inception of and during the term of each hedge.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

     The Company conducts business in several major international currencies through its worldwide operations and is subject to changes in foreign exchange rates of such currencies. Changes in exchange rates can positively or negatively affect the Company's sales, operating margins and retained earnings. The principal functional currencies of the Company's Asian subsidiaries are the Korean won, New Taiwan dollar and Singapore dollar. The principal functional currencies of the Company's European subsidiaries are the British pound and euro.

-23-

 

     The Company attempts to minimize its risk to foreign currency transaction losses by producing its products in the same country in which the products are sold and thereby generating revenues and incurring expenses in the same currency and by managing its working capital. However, there can be no assurance that this approach will be successful, especially in the event of a significant adverse movement in the value of any foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar. In some instances, the Company may sell products in a currency other than the functional currency of the country where it was produced. The Company does not engage in purchasing forward exchange contracts for speculative purposes.

     The Company's primary net foreign currency exposures as of April 29, 2007 included the Korean won, Singapore dollar, New Taiwan dollar, euro, British pound and Chinese renminbi. As of April 29, 2007, a 10% adverse movement in the value of these currencies against the U.S. dollar would have resulted in a net unrealized pre-tax loss of $4.8 million. The Company does not believe that a 10% change in the exchange rates of other non-U.S. dollar currencies would have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

     In April, 2006, the Company's Korean subsidiary entered into a foreign currency rate swap contract. Under the terms of the contract, the Company has effectively converted a $50 million interest bearing intercompany loan denominated in U.S. dollars to Korean won. This contract was initially scheduled to expire in December 2006, however, it has been extended to December 2007. The Company elected not to designate the foreign currency rate swap contract as a hedge which results in a market-to-market adjustment in the income statement.

     In September, 2006, the Company entered into forward contracts to convert the fixed yen purchase price of certain equipment into fixed U.S. dollar amounts. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities," hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow and  are evaluated for effectiveness. The Company records these derivative instruments in either other current assets or non current assets or accrued liabilities, depending on their net position, at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the instrument. Changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instrument are recognized in earnings or in shareholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss depending on whether the derivative financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting as defined by SFAS No. 133.

Interest Rate Risk

     The majority of the Company's borrowings at April 29, 2007 were in the form of its convertible subordinated note, which bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.25%, and certain unsecured international notes payable which bear interest at rates between 6.39% and 6.75%.  At April 29, 2007, the Company had approximately $81 million in net variable rate financial instrument assets which were sensitive to interest rate risk. A 10% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Act of 1934) as of April 29, 2007, the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of April 29, 2007, the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

     There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended April 29, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

-24-

 

PART II.		OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A.		RISKS RELATING TO THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS
		There have been no material changes to risks relating to the Company's business as disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended October 29, 2006.

Item 4.		SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
		(a)			The matters set forth in this Item 4 were submitted to a vote of security holders of the Company at an Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on March 30, 2007.
			(b)		The following directors, constituting the entire Board of Directors, were elected at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on March 30, 2007. Also indicated are the affirmative and authority withheld votes for each director.

(c)

Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as registered independent public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended October 28, 2007.

 

(d)

To consider and vote on a proposal to approve a new 2007 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan.

 

-25-

 

Item 5.		OTHER INFORMATION
		On June 6, 2007, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement which included commitments by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and collateral agent; Citizens Bank of Massachusetts; HSBC Bank USA, National Association; Citibank, N.A.; Bank of America, N.A.; and UBS Loan Finance LLC, which provides for a five-year, revolving credit facility with an aggregate commitment of $125 million (the “credit facility”). The credit facility allows for borrowings in various currencies. The applicable interest rate spread and facility fee varies depending upon the Company’s senior leverage ratio. The Company is subject to compliance with and maintenance of certain financial and other covenants. The credit facility is secured by a pledge of the Company’s stock in certain of its subsidiaries. There were no borrowings under the credit facility as of June 7, 2007.

Item 6.		EXHIBITS
		(a)		Exhibits
				Exhibit Number		Description
				10.25		The Company's 2007 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement which was filed February 23, 2007 (Commission File Number 0-15451)).
				10.26		The Company's Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
				31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
				31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
				32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
				32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		Photronics, Inc.
		(Registrant)
By:		/s/ SEAN T. SMITH
		Sean T. Smith
		Senior Vice President
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer and
		Principal Financial Officer)

 

Date:  June 7, 2007

 

-26-