SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
FORM 10-Q |
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2005 |
|
|
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period from ___ to ___ |
|
|
|
|
|
Commission file number 0-15451 |
PHOTRONICS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Connecticut 06-0854886 15 Secor Road, Brookfield, Connecticut 06804 (Address of principal executive offices and zip code) (203) 775-9000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
126-2 of the Exchange Act). Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act). Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock,
as of the latest practicable date. Class Outstanding at September 1, 2005 Common Stock, $0.01 par value 41,269,072 Shares -1- Forward Looking Information Certain statements in this report are considered "forward
looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All forward looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties. For a description of the factors that could cause the actual results of the Company to be
materially different from those projected, please review the Company's SEC reports that detail these risks and uncertainties and
the section captioned "Forward Looking Information" contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
October 31, 2004. Any forward looking statements should be considered in light of these factors. -2- PHOTRONICS, INC. PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Page Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at 7 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis Item 3. 25 Item 4. 26 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 2. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer Item 6. 27 -3- PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands, except per share amounts) July 31, October 31, (unaudited) ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 233,391 $142,300 Short-term investments 82,420 84,628 Accounts receivable, net 70,641 68,737 Inventories 16,843 16,066 Deferred income taxes and other current assets 39,879 33,995 Total current assets 443,174 345,726 Property, plant and equipment, net 416,729 396,461 Goodwill 136,396 115,906 Other assets 8,231 14,778 $1,004,530 $872,871 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Current portion of long-term debt $ 12,668 $ 3,018 Accounts payable 50,046 57,746 Other accrued liabilities 29,796 29,900 Total current liabilities 92,510 90,664 Long-term debt 249,410 315,888 Deferred income taxes and other liabilities 50,175 52,122 Minority interest 55,547 64,724 Shareholders' equity: Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding - - Common stock, $0.01 par value, 150,000 shares authorized, 41,213 shares issued and
outstanding at July 31, 2005 and 32,690 shares issued and
outstanding at October 31, 2004 412 327 Additional paid-in capital 373,067 202,313 Retained earnings 164,580 134,667 Accumulated other comprehensive income 18,862 12,166 Deferred compensation on restricted stock (33) - Total shareholders' equity 556,888 349,473 $1,004,530 $872,871 See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. -4- Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income (in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited) Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended July 31, August 1, July 31, August 1, Net sales $114,901 $103,728 $328,977 $291,384 Costs and expenses: Cost of sales 75,350 66,485 218,990 192,469 Selling, general and administrative 13,762 13,519 40,001 40,350 Research and development 7,908 7,619 23,803 22,553 Operating income 17,881 16,105 46,183 36,012 Other income (expense), net Interest expense (2,820) (3,422) (8,307) (11,336) Investment and other income, net 4,773 822 5,179 3,352 Income before income taxes and Income tax provision 3,596 1,494 8,048 4,018 Income before minority interest 16,238 12,011 35,007 24,010 Minority interest (1,443) (3,571) (5,093) (7,443) Net income $ 14,795 $ 8,440 $ 29,914 $ 16,567 Earnings per share: Basic $0.42 $0.26 $0.89 $0.51 Diluted $0.35 $0.23 $0.77 $0.47 Weighted average number of Basic 35,295 32,579 33,605 32,533 Diluted 45,269 42,188 43,320 42,360 See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. -5- Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands) (unaudited) Nine Months Ended July 31, August 1, Cash flows from operating
activities: Net income $ 29,914 $ 16,567 Adjustments to reconcile net income Depreciation
and amortization 64,406 64,027 Changes in
assets and liabilities: Accounts
receivable (389) (7,919) Inventories (46) 1,455 Other current
assets (5,455) (654) Accounts payable
and other 16,231 (3,864) Net cash provided by operating activities 104,661 69,612 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property, plant and equipment (89,122) (40,997) Acquisition of additional interest in PK Ltd. (40,350) - Sales (purchases) of short-term investments, net 2,895 (91,409) Other - 608 Net cash used in investing activities (126,577) (131,798) Cash flows from financing activities: Repayments of long-term debt (56,200) (14,408) Net proceeds from issuance of common stock 162,905 - Proceeds from exercised stock options 6,651 1,414 Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 113,356 (12,994) Effect of exchange rate changes on cash flows (349) 2,283 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 91,091 (72,897) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 142,300 214,777 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $233,391 $141,880 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Interest payments $ 6,725 $10,168 Income tax payments $ 5,958 $ 4,048 Change in accrual for purchases of property, See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
-6- PHOTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTE 1 - BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION Photronics, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company" or
"Photronics") is one of the world's leading manufacturers of photomasks, which are high precision photographic quartz plates
containing microscopic images of electronic circuits. Photomasks are a key element in the manufacture of semiconductors and flat
panel displays (FPD), and are used as masters to transfer circuit patterns onto semiconductor wafers and flat panel substrates
during the fabrication of integrated circuits (IC) and a variety of FPD and, to a lesser extent, other types of electrical and
optical components. The Company operates principally from nine manufacturing facilities, three of which are located in the United
States, three in Europe, and one each in Korea, Singapore and Taiwan. During the period ended July 31, 2005, the Company
determined that acquisitions of property, plant and equipment on account, which were previously reported as a component of changes
in operating assets and liabilities and purchases of property, plant and equipment, should not have been reported in the statements
of cash flows. The Company's financial statements for the nine months ended August 1, 2004 have been revised to reflect a
decrease in cash flows provided by operating activities with a corresponding decrease in cash flows used in investing activities of
$11.8 million. Purchases of property, plant and equipment acquired on account have now been presented as supplemental
disclosure of non-cash items. This revision has no effect on net income or the amount of cash and cash equivalents
reported. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending October 30, 2005. Certain amounts in the condensed consolidated financial
statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. For further information, refer to the
consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
October 31, 2004.
-7- NOTE 2 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company has several stock option plans under which
incentive and non-qualified stock options may be granted. The Company accounts for those plans under the recognition and
measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and related
interpretations. Under this method, stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income only if options granted under
those plans had an exercise price less than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Company uses
the Black-Scholes-Merton model to calculate the fair value of stock-based compensation for pro forma disclosure purposes. The
following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock- Based Compensation," to stock-based employee compensation (in
thousands, except per share amounts). Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended July 31, August 1, July 31, August 1, Reported net income $14,795 $8,440 $29,914 $16,567 Deduct: Total stock-based (2,691) (496) (5,712) (1,788) Pro forma net income $12,104 $7,944 $24,202 $14,779 Earnings per share: Basic earnings per share: As reported $0.42 $0.26 $0.89 $0.51 Pro forma $0.34 $0.24 $0.72 $0.45 Diluted earnings per share: As reported $0.35 $0.23 $0.77 $0.47 Pro forma $0.29 $0.21 $0.63 $0.43 In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123, "Share-Based
Payments (revised 2004)," (SFAS No. 123R). This statement eliminates the option to apply the intrinsic value measurement provisions
of APB Opinion No. 25 to stock compensation awards issued to employees. Rather this statement requires companies to measure the
cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award.
That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award -
the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). SFAS No. 123R will also require companies to measure the cost of
employee services received in exchange for Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) awards and the Company will be required to expense
the grant date fair value of the Company's ESPP awards. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission deferred
the effective date of SFAS No. 123R for certain companies, thereby deferring the effective date for the Company from its quarter
beginning August 1, 2005 to its quarter beginning October 31, 2005. Based on the number of stock options outstanding as of
July 31, 2005, the effect of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R would be to increase compensation expense by approximately $0.3 million
in the Company’s fiscal quarter beginning October 31, 2005.
-8-
NOTE 3 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME The following table summarizes comprehensive income for the
three and nine months ended July 31, 2005 and August 1, 2004 (in thousands): Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended July 31, August 1, July 31, August 1, Net income $14,795 $8,440 $29,914 $16,567 Other comprehensive income: Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on investments, Foreign currency translation adjustments (4,010) (1,143) 6,522 5,608 (3,454) (2,012) 6,696 4,243 Total comprehensive income $11,341 $6,428 $36,610 $20,810 NOTE 4 - EARNINGS PER SHARE The calculation of basic earnings per common share and
diluted earnings per common share is presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts): Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended July 31, August 1, July 31, August 1, Net income $14,795 $8,440 $29,914 $16,567 Effect of dilutive securities: Interest expense on convertible notes, net of related tax
effect 1,086 1,086 3,257 3,257 Earnings for diluted earnings per share $15,881 $9,526 $33,171 $19,824 Weighted average common shares computations: Weighted average common shares used for basic earnings Effect of dilutive securities: Convertible notes 9,441 9,441 9,441 9,441 Employee stock options 533 168 274 386 Dilutive potential common shares 9,974 9,609 9,715 9,827 Weighted average common shares used for diluted earnings Basic earnings per share $0.42 $0.26 $0.89 $0.51 Diluted earnings per share $0.35 $0.23 $0.77 $0.47 -9- The effect of the potential conversion of some of the
Company's convertible subordinated notes and the exercise of certain stock options would have been antidilutive. The following
table shows the amount of incremental shares outstanding that would have been added if the assumed conversion of the remaining
convertible subordinated notes and stock options had been dilutive.
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended July 31, August 1, July 31, August 1, Convertible notes 2,705 5,304 2,904 5,372 Employee stock options 609 1,203 839 841 Total potentially dilutive shares excluded 3,314 6,507 3,743 6,213 NOTE 5 - INVESTMENTS Investments, comprised of fixed income bonds and marketable
equity securities, are classified as available-for-sale, and are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices.
Investments available for current operations are classified in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as current assets,
investments held for long-term purposes are included in "Other Assets." Unrealized gains (losses) on investments are as
follows (in thousands): July 31, October 31, Fair value Short-term debt
investments $75,980 $78,764 Short-term equity fund 6,440 5,864 Long-term equity investments 2,251 2,910 Total fair value 84,671 87,538 Cost Short-term debt investments 76,248 78,966 Short-term equity fund 5,000 5,000 Long-term equity investments 135 667 Total cost 81,383 84,633 Unrealized gain (loss) Short-term debt investments (268) (202) Short-term equity fund 1,440 864 Long-term equity investments 2,116 2,243 Total unrealized gain, net 3,288 2,905 Less deferred income taxes 1,314 1,105 Net unrealized gains $ 1,974 $ 1,800 -10-
NOTE 6 - CONSOLIDATION, RESTRUCTURING AND RELATED CHARGES Since 2001, the Company has closed four manufacturing
facilities in North America and one in Europe due in part to the migration of semiconductor manufacturing to Asia, excess capacity
and competitive pricing pressures. Decisions regarding which facilities to close were based on sales volume projections, customer
base and production qualifications. In March 2003, the Company implemented a plan to close its
Phoenix, Arizona manufacturing facility and further consolidate its North American manufacturing network in order to increase
capacity utilization and manufacturing efficiencies. Total consolidation and related charges of $42.0 million were recorded during
the second quarter of fiscal 2003. Components of the charge include $3.4 million for workforce reductions of approximately 170
employees in the United States, $4.4 million for facility lease payments, and $34.2 million of non-cash charges for the impairment
of the carrying value of fixed assets. In August 2002, the Company implemented a consolidation plan
that included the discontinuation of photomask manufacturing at its Milpitas, California site and a reduction of its workforce of
approximately 135 employees in the United States. The total charge associated with this plan was $14.5 million, which included $2.5
million for workforce reductions, $1.5 million for facility lease payments, and $10.5 million of non-cash charges for the
impairment of the carrying value of fixed assets. In April 2001, as part of the Company's final phase of its
merger with Align-Rite, the Company initiated a consolidation plan to consolidate its global photomask manufacturing network and
reduce its global workforce by approximately 120 employees. The total charge of $38.1 million consisted of non-cash charges of
$29.6 million for the impairment of fixed assets and intangible assets, $4.0 million for severance and benefits and $4.5 million
for facility closing costs and lease payments. For these previously announced actions, the Company's
restructuring expenditures were $0.5 million and $1.8 million for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2005 respectively, and
$0.5 million and $1.9 million for the three and nine months ended August 1, 2004, respectively. These payments relate to severance
and benefits for terminated employees, and non-cancelable facility leases and other payments. From April 2001 through July 31,
2005, the Company had expended, including non-cash charges, approximately $91.6 million. The following tables set forth the Company's restructuring
reserve as of July 31, 2005 and reflects the activity affecting the reserve for the three and nine months then ended (in
thousands): Three Months Ended July 31, 2005 May 1, Costs July 31, Manufacturing capacity reduction and
other $3,482 $(518) $2,964 Nine Months Ended July 31, 2005 October 31, Costs July 31, Manufacturing capacity reduction and other $4,717 $(1,753) $2,964 As of July 31, 2005, "manufacturing capacity reduction and
other" of $3.0 million primarily represents non-cancelable lease obligations that will be paid over the respective lease terms
through 2009. -11- The following table sets forth the Company's restructuring
reserve as of August 1, 2004 and reflects the activity affecting the reserve for the three and nine months ended August 1, 2004 (in
thousands): Three Months Ended August 1, 2004 May 2, Costs August 1, Manufacturing capacity reduction and other $5,646 $(195) $5,451 Workforce reductions 333 (333) - Total $5,979 $(528) $5,451 Nine Months Ended August 1, 2004 November 2, Costs August 1, Manufacturing capacity reduction and other $5,855 $ (404) $5,451 Workforce reductions 1,499 (1,499) - Total $7,354 $(1,903) $5,451 -12-
NOTE 7 - SEGMENT INFORMATION The Company operates in a single industry segment as a
manufacturer of photomasks, which are high precision photographic quartz plates containing microscopic images of electronic
circuits for use in the fabrication of semiconductors and FPD. The Company's net sales, operating income (loss) and
identifiable assets by geographic area as of and for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2005 and August 1, 2004 were as
follows (in thousands): As of Operating July 31, 2005: North America $ 36,155 $ 1,498 $103,518 $ (447) $ 542,121 Europe 18,584 2,335 56,445 7,231 109,256 Asia 60,162 14,048 169,014 39,399 353,153 $114,901 $17,881 $328,977 $46,183 $1,004,530 As of Operating Operating August 1, 2004: North
America $ 34,857 $ (714) $106,210 $(1,488) $484,558 Europe 18,019 1,836 51,237 4,196 113,423 Asia 50,852 14,983 133,937 33,304 284,117 $103,728 $16,105 $291,384 $36,012 $882,098 NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES The income tax provision differs from the amount computed by
applying the United States statutory rate of 35% to income before income taxes due to the Company’s reduced tax rates in
certain Asian jurisdictions and valuation allowances placed on certain deferred tax assets generated by net operating loss carry
forwards. The American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA) was signed into law on
October 22, 2004. The AJCA includes a provision for an 85% deduction for the repatriation of certain foreign earnings. The Company
may elect to apply this provision to qualifying earnings repatriations in fiscal 2005. Currently, the Company is reviewing the
published guidance and expects to complete its evaluation within a reasonable period of time following the issuance of final
guidance. The range of possible amounts that the Company is considering for repatriation is between zero and $134 million. The
related potential range of income tax effects is estimated to be between zero and $24 million taking into account the
Company’s tax attributes.
-13-
NOTE 9 - ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL SHARES OF PK LTD. During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, Photronics invested
$40.4 million to purchase 5.4 million additional shares of PK Ltd. (PKL), its non-wholly owned subsidiary in Korea. This
transaction increased the Company's ownership in PKL by 15%, resulting in a total ownership of 90%. As the Company previously
consolidated PKL, the additional incremental ownership has been initially allocated to goodwill with a reduction in minority
interests. The Company is in the process of analyzing fair value attributes of the additional ownership. On August 5, 2005, Photronics announced a tender offer to
acquire all the remaining shares of PKL which the Company did not previously own. On September 6, 2005, additional shares
acquired under this tender offer increased the Company's ownership in PKL to 96.5%, for approximately 18.1 billion Korean won
(approximately US $17.4 million). NOTE 10 - REDEMPTIONS OF SUBORDINATED CONVERTIBLE NOTES On April 14, 2005 and November 10, 2004, the Company
redeemed $10.0 million and $41.4 million, respectively, of its outstanding 4.75% subordinated convertible notes, resulting in an
early extinguishment charge recorded in other income (expense), net, in the condensed consolidated statement of operations of $1.6
million for the nine month period ended July 31, 2005. These redemptions resulted in a total principal balance outstanding of
its 4.75% subordinated convertible notes after the redemptions of $100.1 million as of July 31, 2005. On August 23, 2005, the Company redeemed an additional $13.0
million of its outstanding 4.75% subordinated convertible notes and incurred an early extinguishment charge of $0.3 million
(recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005), resulting in a total principal balance outstanding of $87.1 million after the
redemption. The Company's $100 million revolving credit facility expired
in July 2005 and was not renewed. NOTE 11 - COMMON STOCK OFFERING
In July 2005, the Company issued 8,050,000 shares of its
common stock in a public offering at a price of $21.25 per share. Net of underwriting fees and other offering costs, the
Company's net proceeds under the offering were approximately $162.9 million. NOTE 12 - OTHER RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In November of 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
"Inventory Costs, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4." The purpose of this statement is to
clarify the accounting of abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and waste material. ARB No. 43 stated
that under some circumstances these costs may be so abnormal that they are required to be treated as current period costs.
SFAS 151 requires that these costs be treated as current period costs, regardless if they meet the criteria of "so abnormal." In
addition, the statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities. The provision of this statement shall be effective for inventory costs incurred during
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The early adoption of SFAS 151 did not have a material impact on the Company's results
of operations or financial position. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges
of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29." SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges
occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005, with earlier application permitted. The Company is evaluating SFAS No.
153, and does not believe it will have a material impact on its 2005 consolidated financial statements. In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47
(FIN 47), "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143." FIN 47
clarifies that the term conditional asset retirement obligation as used in SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations", refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of
settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 is effective no
later than the end of fiscal years ending -14- after December 15, 2005. The Company is currently analyzing FIN 47 and does not
believe the adoption of FIN 47 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections" (SFAS 154) which supersedes APB Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes" and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting
Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements." SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of
accounting changes and error corrections. It established, unless impracticable, retrospective application as the required
method for reporting a change in accounting principle in the absence of explicit transition requirements specific to the newly
adopted accounting principle. The reporting of an error correction involves adjustments to previously issued financial
statements similar to those generally applicable to reporting an accounting change retroactively. Therefore, the reporting of
a correction of an error by restating previously issued financial statements is also addressed by SFAS 154, which is effective for
accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS 154 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis Overview Management’s discussion and analysis of the
Company’s financial condition, business results and outlook should be read in conjunction with its condensed consolidated
financial statements and related notes. Various segments of this MD&A do contain forward looking statements, all of which
are presented based on current expectations and may be adversely affected by uncertainties and risk factors presented throughout
this filing and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2004 fiscal year, leading actual results to materially differ from
these expectations.
The Company sells the majority of its photomasks to
semiconductor designers and manufacturers. Further, photomask technology is also used in the fabrication of higher performance
electronic products such as flat panel displays (FPD), micro-electronic mechanical systems and certain nanotechnology applications.
Thus, the Company’s selling cycle is tightly interwoven with the development and release of new semiconductor designs and
flat panel applications, particularly as it relates to these customers' migration to more advanced design methodologies and
fabrication processes. The Company believes that the demand for photomasks primarily depends on design activity rather than sales
volumes from products produced using photomask technologies. Consequently, an increase in semiconductor sales does not necessarily
result in a corresponding increase in photomask sales. In addition, the reduced use of customized integrated circuits (IC), a
reduction in design complexity or other changes in the technology or methods of manufacturing semiconductors, or a slowdown in the
introduction of new semiconductor designs could reduce demand for photomasks even if demand for semiconductors increases. Further,
advances in design and production methods for semiconductors and other high performance electronics could reduce the demand for
photomasks. Historically, the semiconductor industry has been volatile, with sharp periodic downturns and slowdowns. These
downturns have been characterized by, among other things, diminished product demand, excess production capacity and accelerated
erosion of selling prices. At this time, state-of-the-art for IC and FPD masks are
considered to be 65 nanometer and G6 - G7 process technology, respectively, while 90 nanometer is in the early stages of being
moved into volume production; currently 130 and 180 nanometer and G3 through G5 process technology for FPD constitute the majority
of designs being fabricated in volume. The Company expects there to be a steady increase in 130 nanometer designs moving to wafer
fabrication into fiscal 2006 and believes it is well positioned to service an increasing volume of this business through
investments in manufacturing processes and technology in the global regions where its customers are located. Recently, the
Company has experienced growth in demand for FPD photomasks, which it currently supplies to customers from its existing facility in
Korea. The Company is commencing construction on two new photomask facilities, one in Taichung, Taiwan and one in Shanghai,
China. The Company's new facility in Taiwan will be able to serve the demand for large area mask solutions to support
Taiwan's expanding FPD fabrication industry. Completion of these facilities is expected in 2006. In addition to its cyclical nature, the global semiconductor
industry experienced tremendous technology-based difficulties in transitioning from the 180 nanometer process node to the 130
nanometer process node. The Company believes that these technological issues have been addressed, as seen by improving yields and
utilization rates in the Company's mask fabrication facilities and its customers' wafer fabrication facilities. End markets leading
the global semiconductor industry out of a downturn in 2004 have been closely tied to consumer driven applications for
high -15- performance semiconductor devices, including, but not limited to, communications and
mobile computing solutions. The Company cannot predict the degree of difficulty in future process node transitions; the timing of
the industry’s transition to volume production of next generation technology nodes; or the timing of up and down cycles with
precise accuracy, but believes that such transitions and cycles will continue into the future, which could affect its business,
financial condition and operating results in the near term. The Company’s ability to remain successful in these environments
is based upon achieving its goals of being a service and technology leader, an efficient solutions supplier, and a company able to
continually reinvest in its global infrastructure. The photomask industry has been, and is expected to continue
to be, characterized by technological change and evolving industry standards. In order to remain competitive, the Company will be
required to continually anticipate, respond to and utilize changing technologies. In particular, the Company believes that as
semiconductor geometries continue to become smaller and FPD sizes larger and resolution improved, it will be required to
manufacture increasingly complex optically enhanced reticles, including optical proximity correction and phase-shift photomasks.
Additionally, demand for photomasks has been, and could in the future be adversely affected by changes in methods of manufacturing
(which could affect the type or quantity of photomasks utilized), such as changes in semiconductor and FPD demand that favor field
programmable gate arrays and other semiconductor designs that replace application-specific IC. Through the first nine months of
fiscal 2005, the Company has not experienced a significant loss of revenue as a result of alternative semiconductor design
methodologies. Additionally, increased market acceptance of alternative methods of transferring circuit designs onto semiconductor
wafers, such as direct-write lithography, could reduce or eliminate the need for certain types or all photomasks entirely. Through
the first nine months of fiscal 2005, direct-write lithography has not been proven to be a commercially viable alternative to
photomasks, as it is considered too slow for high volume semiconductor wafer production. However, should direct-write or other
alternative methods of transferring IC designs to semiconductor wafers be done without the use of photomasks, the Company's
business and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. If the Company is unable to anticipate, respond to, or
utilize these or other changing technologies, due to resource, technological or other constraints, its business and results of
operations could be materially adversely affected. Both revenues and costs have been affected by the increased
demand for high-end technology photomasks that require more advanced manufacturing capabilities but generally command higher
average selling prices. To meet the technological demands of its customers and position the Company for future growth, the Company
continues to make substantial investments in high-end manufacturing capability both at existing and new facilities. Property, plant
and equipment capitalized for new facilities and equipment to support its customers' requirements for high technology products was
an aggregate of approximately $254 million for the three fiscal years ended October 31, 2004, plus $75.1 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2005. Based on the anticipated technological changes
in the industry, the Company expects these trends to continue. The Company anticipates capital expenditures to be in the
range of $110 million to $125 million for the fiscal year ending October 30, 2005. The manufacture of photomasks for use in fabricating IC and
other related products built using comparable photomask-based process technologies has been, and continues to be, capital
intensive, based upon the need to maintain a technology-based infrastructure. The Company's integrated global manufacturing network
and employees, which consist of nine sites, represent a significant portion of its fixed operating cost base. Should sales volumes
decrease based upon the flow of design releases from the Company's customers, the Company may have excess and underutilized
production capacity that could significantly impact operating margins. Currently, the vast majority of photomasks produced for the
semiconductor industry employ geometries of 130 nanometers or larger. In the FPD market, the majority of photomasks produced are to
support Generation 3 to Generation 5 processes. At these technologies, the Company can produce full lines of photomasks and
there is no significant technology employed by the Company's competitors that is not available to the Company. Recently, a limited
amount of semiconductor fabrication has begun utilizing 90 nanometer and Generation 6 and Generation 7 processes. The Company
is currently capable of producing a broad range of photomasks at still smaller geometries, and has begun accelerating its efforts
to support the development and production of photomasks for both the 65 nanometer and 45 nanometer technology nodes in
semiconductors and Generation 8 in FPD. However, as is typical of industries in the midst of technological change, some of the
Company's competitors may be able to achieve higher manufacturing yields than the Company when producing these more complex
photomasks, in part because these competitors may have completed more cycles of learning than the Company in this area, and in part
because of the Company's need to replicate production of these -16- complex photomasks at its four advanced technology locations world-wide. The Company
believes that these cases are not material to its business. Material Changes in Results of Operations The following table represents selected operating
information expressed as a percentage of net sales: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended July 31, August 1, July 31, August 1, Net sales 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost of sales 65.6 64.1 66.6 66.1 Gross margin 34.4 35.9 33.4 33.9 Selling, general and administrative expenses 12.0 13.0 12.2 13.8 Research and development expenses 6.9 7.3 7.2 7.7 Operating income 15.5 15.6 14.0 12.4 Other income (expense), net 1.7 (2.5) (1.0) (2.7) Income before income taxes 17.2 13.0 Income tax provision 3.1 1.5 2.4 1.4 Minority interest (1.2) (3.4) (1.5) (2.6) Net income 12.9% 8.1% 9.1% 5.7% Note: All of the following tabular comparisons,
unless otherwise indicated, are for the quarters ended July 31, 2005 (Q3 2005) and August 1, 2004 (Q3 2004) and for the nine months
ended July 31, 2005 (YTD 2005) and August 1, 2004 (YTD 2004) in millions: Net Sales Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Q3 Q3 Percent YTD YTD Percent Net sales $114.9 $103.7 10.8% $329.0 $291.4 12.9% Net sales for the three months ended July 31, 2005 increased
10.8% to $114.9 million as compared to $103.7 million for the three months ended August 1, 2004. Sales increased for
photomasks used for both IC and FPD (which typically have higher average selling prices than IC photomasks) as a result of
increased design releases for IC photomasks and improved FPD revenue associated with increased demand for FPD. The increase
in sales is also related to an improved high-end mix which is defined as mask sets for semiconductor designs at and below 130
nanometer, and for FPD sets utilizing G6 and G7 technology. By geographic area, net sales in Asia increased $9.3 million or
18.3%, North American sales increased $1.3 million or 3.7% and European sales increased $0.6 million or 3.1%. -17- Net sales for the nine months ended July 31, 2005 increased
12.9% to $329.0 million as compared to $291.4 million for the nine months ended August 1, 2004. The increase is a result of
increased sales of FPD photomasks and improved design releases for IC photomasks associated with the improved semiconductor market
during fiscal 2005.
Gross Margin Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Q3 Q3 Percent YTD YTD Percent Gross
margin $39.6 $37.2 6.2% $110.0 $98.9 11.2% Percentage to sales 34.4% 35.9% 33.4% 33.9% Gross margin was 34.4% and 33.4% of net sales for the three
and nine months ended July 31, 2005 and 35.9% and 33.9% for the three and nine months ended August 1, 2004. The gross margin
did not experience an increase in fiscal 2005 that would typically result from increase revenue as compared to the respective prior
year periods as a result of increased infrastructure costs associated with expansion of the Company's manufacturing base, primarily
related to additional costs of equipment and production capability in Asia. To a lesser extent, gross margin was impacted in
2005 by increased material costs associated with increased FPD sales and increased equipment and infrastructure costs in Asia. The
Company operates in a high fixed cost environment and to the extent that the Company’s revenues and capacity utilization
increases or decreases, gross margin will be positively or negatively impacted. The gross margin percentage throughout the remainder of
fiscal 2005 could be negatively impacted by increased depreciation expense associated with the Company’s capital expenditures
for additional tool sets and corresponding infrastructure for FPD and advanced photomask technologies. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Q3 Q3 Percent YTD YTD Percent Selling, general and Percentage to sales 12.0% 13.0% 12.2% 13.8% Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 1.8%
for the three months ended July 31, 2005, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The increase in expenses
is a result of additional costs associated with the Company's expansion in Asia, primarily related to the Company’s Taiwan
FPD and China facilities and costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. For the nine months ended July 31, 2005, selling, general
and administrative expenses decreased $0.4 million to $40.0 million, compared to the same period in the prior year.
-18-
Research and Development Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Q3 Q3 Percent YTD YTD Percent Research & development $7.9 $7.6 3.8% $23.8 $22.6 5.5% Percentage to sales 6.9% 7.3% 7.2% 7.7% Research and development expenses increased $0.3 million to
$7.9 million for the three months ended July 31, 2005, compared with $7.6 million for the same period in the prior fiscal
year. Research and development expenses for the nine months ended July 31, 2005 increased $1.2 million to $23.8 million
compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. Research and development expenditures are for continued development for
advanced process technologies, consisting of global development efforts for high-end process technologies for advanced sub
wavelength reticle solutions at and below 65 nanometers and next generation FPD technologies. Operating Income (Loss) The following table sets forth the operating income (loss)
by geographic area for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2005 and August 1, 2004: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Q3 Q3 Percent YTD YTD Percent North
America $ 1.5 $(0.7) - $(0.4) $(1.5) - Europe 2.3 1.8 27% 7.2 4.2 72% Asia 14.1 15.0 (6%) 39.4 33.3 18% Total $17.9 $16.1 11% $46.2 $36.0 28%
Other Income (Expense), Net Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Q3 Q3 YTD YTD Interest expense $(2.8) $(3.4) $(8.3) $(11.3) Investment and other income, net 4.8 0.8 5.2 3.3 Other income (expense), net $ 2.0 $(2.6) $(3.1) $ (8.0) Interest expense decreased $0.6 million and $3.0 million,
respectively, for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2005 as compared to the three and nine months ended August 1,
2004. The decrease was primarily a result of reduced debt associated with the Company’s aggregate redemption, from June
2004 through April 2005, of $100 million principal of its 4.75% convertible subordinated notes. Investment and other income,
net, increased $4.0 million and $1.8 million respectively for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2005 as compared to the
three and nine months ended August 1, 2004. The increase is a result of a favorable settlement of an existing grant
obligation, foreign currency gains and increased investment income from proceeds received by the Company under its stock offering
in early July 2005.
-19-
Provision for Income Taxes The provision for income taxes for the quarter ended July
31, 2005 was $3.6 million as compared to $1.5 million for the quarter ended August 1, 2004. For the nine months ended July 31, 2005
the provision for income taxes was $8.0 million compared to a provision of $4.0 million for the nine months ended August 1, 2004.
The effective income tax rate for the nine months ended July 31, 2005 was 19% compared with 14% for the comparable 2004 period. The
effective tax rate is impacted by tax holidays, credits and the Company's inability to record tax benefits on the net operating
losses generated in the U.S. The Company’s operations have followed the recent migration of the semiconductor industry to
Asia, where the Company operates in countries where it is accorded favorable tax treatment. The Company has a tax holiday in Taiwan
which expires in December 2006. The Company's tax holiday in Singapore expired in June 2005. In Korea, various
investment tax credits have been utilized to further reduce the Company’s overall effective income tax rate. The American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA) was signed into law on
October 22, 2004. The AJCA includes a provision for an 85% deduction for the repatriation of certain foreign earnings. The Company
may elect to apply this provision to qualifying earnings repatriations in fiscal 2005. Currently, the Company is reviewing the
published guidance and expects to complete its evaluation within a reasonable period of time following the issuance of final
guidance. The range of possible amounts that the Company is considering for repatriation is between zero and $134 million. The
related potential range of income tax effects is estimated to be between zero and $24 million taking into account the
Company’s tax attributes. Minority Interest Minority interest, which represents the minority interest in
earnings of the Company's non-wholly owned subsidiaries in Taiwan and Korea, was $1.4 million and $3.6 million for the three months
ended July 31, 2005 and August 1, 2004, respectively, and $5.1 million and $7.4 million for the nine months ended July 31, 2005 and
August 1, 2004, respectively. The Company’s ownership in its subsidiary in Taiwan was approximately 58% at July 31, 2005 and
October 31, 2004. The Company’s ownership in its subsidiary in Korea was 90% at July 31, 2005 and 75% at October 31, 2004.
The increased ownership was a result of an additional investment of $40.4 million made by the Company during 2005. The decrease in
minority interest during the three and nine month periods ended July 31, 2005 as compared to the same periods in the prior year was
due to the increased ownership of the Company’s subsidiary in Korea, which was offset in part by increased earnings of these
subsidiaries in 2005. On August 5, 2005, Photronics announced a tender offer to
acquire all the remaining shares of PKL which the Company did not previously own. On September 6, 2005, additional shares
acquired under this tender offer increased the Company's ownership in PKL to 96.5%, for approximately 18.1 billion Korean won
(approximately US $17.4 million). Liquidity and Capital Resources The Company's working capital at July 31, 2005 increased
$95.6 million to $350.7 million as compared with $255.1 million at October 31, 2004. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments at July 31, 2005 were $315.8 million compared to $226.9 million at October 31, 2004. Working capital, cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments increased during the nine months ended July 31, 2005 due to net proceeds of $162.9 million
received by the Company under its public stock offering in July 2005 and cash generated from operations, less the redemption of
$51.4 million of its 4.75% convertible subordinated notes and $40.4 million additional investment in PKL and capital expenditures.
Cash provided by operating activities was $104.7 million for the nine months ended July 31, 2005, as compared to $69.6 million for
the same period last year. This increase was primarily due to increased net income generated during the first nine months of
2005. Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended July 31, 2005 was $126.6 million, which is primarily
comprised of the $40.4 million additional investment in PKL and capital expenditures of $89.1 million. Cash provided by
financing activities was $113.4 million, which was primarily comprised of the redemption of $51.4 million of the Company's 4.75%
convertible subordinated notes and net proceeds of $163 million from the Company's public stock offering. The Company's $100 million revolving credit facility expired
in July 2005 and was not renewed. -20- On August 5, 2005, Photronics announced a tender offer to
acquire all the remaining shares of PKL which the Company did not previously own. On September 6, 2005, additional shares
acquired under this tender offer increased the Company's ownership in PKL to 96.5%, for approximately 18.1 billion Korean won
(approximately US $17.4 million). The Company's commitments represent investments in
additional manufacturing capacity as well as advanced equipment for the production of high-end, more complex photomasks. As of July
31, 2005, Photronics had commitments outstanding for capital expenditures of approximately $63 million. Additional commitments for
capital expenditures are expected to be incurred during the remainder of fiscal 2005. The Company expects capital expenditures for
fiscal 2005 to be approximately $110 to $125 million. The Company will continue to use its working capital to finance its capital
expenditures. Photronics believes that its currently available resources, together with its capacity for growth, and its access to
other debt and equity financing sources, are sufficient to satisfy its currently planned capital expenditures, as well as its
anticipated working capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Business Outlook The Company expects revenue growth for the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2005 in both IC and FPD photomasks. A majority of the revenue growth in 2005 has come from, and is expected to
continue to come from, the Asian region as customers increase their use of manufacturing foundries located outside of North America
and Europe. The Company's Korean and Taiwanese operations are non-wholly owned subsidiaries; therefore a portion of earnings
generated at each location is allocated to the minority shareholders. For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company expects
diluted earnings per share to decrease compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily due to other income gains recognized
in the third quarter which were not expected to repeat in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. The Company is projecting an
effective tax rate of 17% to 20% for fiscal 2005, dependent upon the country in which the pre-tax income is generated. Property, plant and equipment which was capitalized during
the first nine months of 2005 was $75.1 million, which includes accrued capital expenditures of $14.0 million. The Company is
planning on capital spending of $110 million to $125 million to be capitalized for the full year of fiscal 2005. This spending
includes the installation of a 65 nanometer production line, additional large area mask production capacity, and a facility and
equipment costs for the China and Taiwan FPD sites. The Company’s future results of operations and the
other forward looking statements contained in this filing involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including the projected
fourth quarter results of 2005. Various factors that have been discussed and a number of other factors could cause actual
results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations. Application of Critical Accounting Policies The Company's consolidated financial statements are based
on the selection and application of significant accounting policies, which require management to make significant estimates and
assumptions. The Company believes that the following are some of the more critical judgment areas in the application of the
Company's accounting policies that affect its financial condition and results of operations. Estimates and Assumptions The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect amounts reported in them. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company's estimates are based on the facts and circumstances available at
the time; different reasonable estimates could have been used in the current period, and changes in the accounting estimates used
are likely to occur from period to period, which may have a material impact on the presentation of the Company's financial
condition and results of operations. Actual results reported by the Company may differ from such estimates. The Company reviews
these estimates periodically and reflects the effect of revisions in the period that they are determined.
-21-
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities The Company records derivatives in the consolidated balance
sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivatives
are reported in the consolidated statements of operations or as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component
of shareholders' equity, depending on the use of the derivatives and whether they qualify for hedge accounting. In order to qualify
for hedge accounting, the derivative must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of the
hedged items during the term of the hedge. The Company uses judgment in assessing the fair value of derivatives and related
financial instruments, including assumptions utilized in derivative fair value models in areas such as projected interest rates and
changes in the Company's stock price during the contract term. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Repairs and maintenance, as well as renewals and replacements of a routine nature are
charged to operations as incurred, while those which improve or extend the lives of existing assets are capitalized. Upon sale or
other disposition, the cost of the asset and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss
is reflected in operations. Depreciation and amortization are computed on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over 15 to
40 years, machinery and equipment over 3 to 10 years and furniture, fixtures and office equipment over 3 to 5 years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the life of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvement, whichever is less. Judgment
and assumptions are used in establishing estimated useful lives and depreciation periods. The Company also uses judgment and
assumptions as it periodically reviews property, plant and equipment for any potential impairment in carrying values whenever
events such as a significant industry downturn, plant closures, technological obsolescence or other changes in circumstances
indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Actual fair values may differ from estimated fair values. Intangible Assets Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill and other
acquisition-related intangibles, and software development costs. These assets are stated at fair value as of the date acquired less
accumulated amortization. Amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 5 years for software
development costs and, prior to November 1, 2001, 3 to 15 years for goodwill and acquisition-related assets. As a result of the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized, but the future economic
benefit of the carrying value of all intangible assets is reviewed annually and the Company uses judgment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an intangible asset may not be recoverable based on discounted cash flows
or market factors and an impairment loss would be recorded in the period so determined. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets and certain identifiable assets to be held
and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets
may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the Company's judgment and estimate of undiscounted future cash
flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets and
certain identifiable intangible assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset. Long-lived
assets and certain identifiable intangible assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less
costs to sell.
-22-
Income Taxes The income tax provision (benefit) is computed on the basis
of consolidated financial statement income or loss before income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income
tax purposes. In the event the Company determines that future taxable income is not expected to be sufficient, the Company uses
judgment and assumptions to determine if valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets are required by considering future
market growth, forecasted operations, future taxable income, and the mix of earnings in the tax jurisdictions in which it operates
in order to determine the need for a valuation allowance. The Company considers income taxes in each of the tax
jurisdictions in which it operates in order to determine its effective income tax rate. Current income tax exposure is identified
along with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and financial reporting purposes.
These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
The actual annual amount of taxable income in each tax jurisdiction may differ from the estimates used to compute the effective
income tax rate during the first, second and third quarters. Additionally, the Company evaluates the recoverability of deferred
income tax assets from future taxable income and establishes valuation allowances if recovery is deemed not likely. Accordingly,
the income tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations is impacted by changes in the valuation allowance.
Significant management estimates and judgment are required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax
assets. Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue when both title and risk of
loss transfer to the customer. The Company makes estimates and assumptions and uses judgment relating to discounts and estimates
for product return and warranties which are accrued and recognized at the time of sale. Discounts - Sales discounts are negotiated
with customers prior to billing and at the time of billing, sales invoices are prepared net of negotiated sales
discounts. Product Returns - Customer returns have
historically been insignificant. However, the Company does record a liability for the insignificant amount of estimated sales
returns based upon historical experience. Warranties and Other Post Shipment
Obligations - For a 30-day period, the Company warrants that items sold will conform to customer specification.
However, the Company's liability is limited to repair or replacement of the photomasks at its sole option. The Company inspects
photomasks for conformity to customer specifications prior to shipment. Accordingly, customer returns of items under warranty have
historically been insignificant. However, the Company records a liability for the insignificant amount of estimated warranty
returns based on historical experience. The Company's specific return policies include accepting returns for products with defects
or products that have not been produced to precise customer specifications. At the time of shipment, a liability is established for
these items. Customer Acceptance - Customer acceptance
occurs concurrently with the transfer of title and risk of loss based upon the applicable shipping and delivery terms.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - The
Company is required to use considerable judgment in estimating the collectibility of its accounts receivable. This estimate is
based on a variety of factors, including the length of time receivables are past due, macroeconomic conditions, significant
one-time events, and historical experience.
-23-
Effect of New Accounting Standards In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, "Share-Based Payments (revised 2004)," (SFAS No. 123R). This statement eliminates the option
to apply the intrinsic value measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," to stock
compensation awards issued to employees. Rather this statement requires companies to measure the cost of employee services received
in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over
the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award - the requisite service period
(usually the vesting period). SFAS No. 123R will also require companies to measure the cost of employee services received in
exchange for Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) awards and the Company will be required to expense the grant date fair value of
the Company's ESPP awards. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 123R
for certain companies, thereby deferring the effective date for the Company from its quarter beginning August 1, 2005 to its
quarter beginning October 31, 2005. Based on the number of stock options outstanding as of July 31, 2005, the effect of the
adoption of SFAS No. 123R would be to increase compensation expense by approximately $0.3 million in the Company’s fiscal
quarter beginning October 31, 2005. In November of 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
"Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4." The purpose of this statement is to clarify the accounting of
abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and waste material. ARB No. 43 stated that under some
circumstances these costs may be so abnormal that they are required to be treated as current period costs. SFAS 151 requires
that these costs be treated as current period costs regardless if they meet the criteria of "so abnormal." In addition, the
statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the
production facilities. The provision of this statement shall be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. The early adoption of SFAS 151 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations
or financial position. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges
of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29." SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges
occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005, with earlier application permitted. The Company is evaluating SFAS No.
153, and does not believe it will have a material impact on its 2005 consolidated financial statements. In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47
(FIN 47), "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143." FIN 47
clarifies that the term conditional asset retirement obligation as used in SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations", refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of
settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 is effective no
later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company is currently analyzing FIN 47 and does not
believe the adoption of FIN 47 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections" (SFAS 154) which supersedes APB Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes" and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting
Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements." SFAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of
accounting changes and error corrections. It established, unless impracticable, retrospective application as the required
method for reporting a change in accounting principle in the absence of explicit transition requirements specific to the newly
adopted accounting principle. The reporting of an error correction involves adjustments to previously issued financial
statements similar to those generally applicable to reporting an accounting change retroactively. Therefore, the reporting of
a correction of an error by restating previously issued financial statements is also addressed by SFAS 154, which is effective for
accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS 154 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. -24-
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk The Company records derivatives on the balance sheet as
assets or liabilities, measured at fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those derivatives are
reported in the statement of operations or as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders'
equity, depending on the use of the derivatives and whether they qualify for hedge accounting. In order to qualify for hedge
accounting, the derivative must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged items
during the term of the hedge. In general, the types of risks hedged are those relating to the variability of future cash flows
caused by movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company documents its risk management strategy and hedge effectiveness
at the inception of and during the term of each hedge. During fiscal 2002, the Company entered into an interest
rate swap contract, which effectively converted $100 million of its 4.75% fixed rate convertible subordinated notes to a variable
rate. Contract payments are made on a LIBOR based variable rate (5.01% at July 31, 2005) and are received at the 4.75% fixed
rate. The interest rate swap contract is used to adjust the
proportion of total debt that is subject to fixed interest rates. This contract is considered to be a hedge against interest rate
risk of the Company's fixed rate debt obligation. Accordingly, the contract has been reflected at fair value in the Company's
consolidated balance sheets and the related portion of fixed rate debt being hedged is reflected at an amount equal to the sum of
its carrying value plus an adjustment representing the change in fair value of the debt obligation attributable to the interest
rate risk being hedged. In addition, changes during any accounting period in the fair value of the contract, as well as offsetting
changes in the adjusted carrying value of the related portion of fixed rate debt being hedged, are recognized as adjustments to
interest expense in the Company's consolidated statements of operations. The net effect of this accounting on the Company's
operations results, is that the interest expense portion of fixed rate debt being hedged is generally recorded based on variable
rates. At this time, the Company does not have plans to enter into additional interest rate swap contracts, however, at a future
point the Company may decide to do so. Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk The Company conducts business in several major international
currencies through its worldwide operations and is subject to changes in foreign exchange rates of such currencies. Changes in
exchange rates can positively or negatively affect the Company's sales, operating margins and retained earnings. The principal
functional currencies of the Company's Asian subsidiaries are the Korean won, New Taiwan dollar and Singapore dollar. The principal
functional currencies of the Company's European subsidiaries are the British pound and euro. The Company attempts to minimize its risk to foreign
currency transaction losses by producing its products in the same country in which the products are sold and thereby generating
revenues and incurring expenses in the same currency and by managing its working capital. In some instances, the Company may sell
products in a currency other than the functional currency of the country where it was produced. To date, the Company has not
experienced a significant foreign exchange loss on these sales. However, there can be no assurance that this approach will be
successful, especially in the event of a significant adverse movement in the value of any foreign currencies against the United
States dollar. The Company does not engage in purchasing forward exchange contracts for speculative purposes. The Company's primary net foreign currency exposures as of
July 31, 2005 included the Korean won, Singapore dollar, New Taiwan dollar, euro and the British pound. As of July 31, 2005, a 10%
adverse movement in the value of these currencies against the United States dollar would have resulted in a net unrealized pre-tax
loss of $4.3 million. The Company does not believe that a 10% change in the exchange rates of other non-U.S. dollar foreign
currency balances would have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
-25-
Interest Rate Risk The majority of the Company's borrowings are in the form of
its convertible subordinated notes, which bear interest at rates of 2.25% and 4.75%, and certain foreign unsecured notes payable
which bear interest at rates between 5.39% and 5.49%. In addition, the interest rate swap contract discussed above subjects the
Company to market risk as interest rates fluctuate and impacts the interest payments due on the $100 million notional amount of the
contract. At July 31, 2005, the Company had approximately $113 million in variable rate financial instruments which were sensitive
to interest rate risk. A 10% change in interest rates would not have a material net effect on the Company's consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows. Item 4. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company's chief executive officer and chief financial
officer have concluded that, as of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) were effective, based on the
evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
and Affiliated Purchasers Maximum Number Total Number of (or Approximate Dollar Principal Amount Value of Principal Total Principal Average Price Paid of Convertible Notes Amount of Convertible Amount of Per $1,000 Principal Purchased as Part Notes) that May Yet to Convertible Notes Amount of of Publicly Announced be Purchased Under the Purchased Convertible Notes Plans or Programs Plans or Programs November $41,413,000 $1,015 $ - $ - (1) December January February March April 10,000,000 1,010 - - (1) May June July $51,413,000 $1,014 $ - $ - (1) The Company does not have a specific bond repurchase program established
and all of the repurchases were made in open market transactions. Note: In August 2005, the Company purchased $13,000,000 principal amount of its
4.75% convertible subordinated notes at an Average Price Paid per $1,000 Principal Amount of $1,010. -26- Exhibits (a) Exhibits Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized. Photronics, Inc. (Registrant) By: /s/ SEAN T. SMITH Sean T. Smith Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) Date: September 7, 2005 -27-
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation of organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Yes x No o
Yes o No x
AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
July 31, 2005 (unaudited) and October 31, 2004
4
5
6
of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
15
and Affiliated Purchasers
26
2005
2004
2005
2004
2005
2004
minority interest
19,834
13,505
43,055
28,028
common shares outstanding:
2005
2004
to net cash provided by operating activities:
plant and equipment
$(14,049)
$11,839
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Three and Nine Months Ended July 31, 2005 and August 1, 2004
(unaudited)
2005
2004
2005
2004
employee compensation expense
determined under fair value-based
method for all awards, net of
related tax effects
2005
2004
2005
2004
net of tax
556
(869)
174
(1,365)
2005
2004
2005
2004
per share
35,295
32,579
33,605
32,533
per share
45,269
42,188
43,320
42,360
2005
2004
2005
2004
2005
2004
2005
Paid
2005
2004
Paid
2005
2004
Paid
2004
2003
Paid
2004
Three Months
Nine Months
July 31, 2005
Net
Sales
Operating
Income
Net
Sales
Income
(Loss)
Total
Assets
Three Months
Nine Months
August 1, 2004
Net
Sales
Income
(Loss)
Net
Sales
Income
(Loss)
Total
Assets
AND
EXPIRATION OF CREDIT FACILITY
of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
Three and Nine Months ended July 31, 2005 versus August 1, 2004
2005
2004
2005
2004
and minority interest
13.0
9.7
2005
2004
Change
2005
2004
Change
2005
2004
Change
2005
2004
Change
2005
2004
Change
2005
2004
Change
administrative
expenses
$13.8
$13.5
1.8%
$40.0
$40.4
(0.9%)
2005
2004
Change
2005
2004
Change
2005
2004
Change
2005
2004
Change
2005
2004
2005
2004
During the Nine Months Ended July 31,
2005
Number
Description
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EXHIBIT 31.1 |
||
|
||
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer |
||
|
||
I, Michael J. Luttati, Chief Executive Officer of Photronics, Inc., certify that: |
||
|
||
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Photronics, Inc. |
|
|
||
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report. |
|
|
||
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report. |
|
|
||
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
|
|
||
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
||
|
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
|
c) |
disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
||
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: |
|
|
||
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
||
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
September 7, 2005 |
|
/s/ MICHAEL J. LUTTATI |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Luttati |
EXHIBIT 31.2 |
||
|
||
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer |
||
|
||
I, Sean T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Photronics, Inc., certify that: |
||
|
||
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Photronics, Inc. |
|
|
||
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report. |
|
|
||
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report. |
|
|
||
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
|
|
||
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
||
|
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
|
c) |
disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
||
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: |
|
|
||
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
||
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
September 7, 2005 |
|
/s/ SEAN T. SMITH |
|
|
|
|
|
Sean T. Smith |
EXHIBIT 32.1
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
I, Michael J. Luttati, Chief Executive Officer of Photronics, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:
(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ MICHAEL J. LUTTATI |
|
Michael J. Luttati |
Chief Executive Officer |
September 7, 2005 |
EXHIBIT 32.2
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
I, Sean T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Photronics, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:
(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ SEAN T. SMITH |
|
Sean T. Smith |
Chief Financial Officer |
September 7, 2005 |